Reparative futures of smart urban governance: A speculative design approach for multispecies justice
Futures, ISSN: 0016-3287, Vol: 154, Page: 103266
2023
- 8Citations
- 81Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In recent years, urban governance within smart city contexts has increasingly turned towards processes and practices of “futuring” to guide city visions and planning. Particularly with the increased focus on sustainability within smart urban governance, these futuring practices often rely on environmental monitoring technologies to guide reparative actions for environmental harms and promote multispecies justice. Yet, these futuring practices often overlook or are disconnected from the past where these environmental harms and injustices were sustained. Little attention has been paid to how smart urban governance might consider both past and future to better account for multispecies justice. This paper introduces a speculative design methodology within a reparative futures framework as it explores multispecies justice in smart urban governance. It reports on a methodological study conducted in Brisbane, Australia, in which participants—including policymakers, environmental lawyers, scientists, urban planners, and climate activists—undertook a speculative futuring design process intending to address past harms faced by multiple species and to repair relations within a more-than-human world. Direct engagement with the past in futuring practices helps us reflect on how smart urban governance might take accountability and institute better reparative actions to materialise multispecies justice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328723001702; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103266; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174696751&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016328723001702; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103266
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know