Waiting on the Fringe: cell autonomy and signaling delays in segmentation clocks
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, ISSN: 0959-437X, Vol: 63, Page: 61-70
2020
- 17Citations
- 35Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef14
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
- Mentions1
- References1
- 1
Review Description
The rhythmic and sequential segmentation of the vertebrate body axis into somites during embryogenesis is governed by a multicellular, oscillatory patterning system called the segmentation clock. Despite many overt similarities between vertebrates, differences in genetic and dynamic regulation have been reported, raising intriguing questions about the evolution and conservation of this fundamental patterning process. Recent studies have brought insights into two important and related issues: (1) whether individual cells of segmentation clocks are autonomous oscillators or require cell–cell communication for their rhythm; and (2) the role of delays in the cell–cell communication that synchronizes the population of genetic oscillators. Although molecular details differ between species, conservation may exist at the level of the dynamics, hinting at rules for evolutionary trajectories in the system.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959437X20300514; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2020.04.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085654398&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32505051; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959437X20300514; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2020.04.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know