The road less traveled: Addressing reproducibility and conservation priorities of wildlife-vehicle collision studies in tropical and subtropical regions
Global Ecology and Conservation, ISSN: 2351-9894, Vol: 27, Page: e01584
2021
- 15Citations
- 67Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Roads are expanding at an extremely high rate, and have a significant direct impact on biodiversity through wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC). This threat is well documented for the temperate regions of North America and Europe, but the information from the remaining countries is limited or scattered. To evaluate reproducibility and conservation value of current WVC data, we analyzed 308 peer-reviewed studies from 41 tropical and subtropical countries across 20 years and five languages, representing 2485 vertebrate species and 139,602 unique WVC events. Only 107 of these 2485 species have roads listed as a threat within the Threat Classification Scheme developed for the IUCN Red List. Study design mostly focused on mammals, and specifically on medium- to large-sized species. We also revealed a strong geographic bias towards South America, and primarily Brazil, while both Asia and Africa require more long-term standardized road mortality studies. Overall, we identified several reporting gaps in WVC studies that limit reproducibility and comparability. Our results highlight the need for standardized reporting within wildlife-vehicle collision studies, and the need for further research on a number of threatened species with potentially high road mortality rates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421001347; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01584; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104340042&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2351989421001347; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2351989421001347?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2351989421001347?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01584
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know