Toward co-management of Iran's rangelands: Combining stakeholder analysis and social networks analysis
Global Ecology and Conservation, ISSN: 2351-9894, Vol: 46, Page: e02572
2023
- 5Citations
- 35Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Rangelands Degradation in Iran: A Looming Environmental Crisis
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Email Print Rangelands in Iran are about 84.7 million hectares of grazing land, which accounts for 52% of the country’s
Article Description
The main feature of common pool resources, particularly rangelands, is the presence of different stakeholders in them with conflicting goals, values, and interests. Conflict among stakeholders, other than competition over rangeland exploitation and ecosystem destruction, is a big challenge in the effective management of rangeland conservation. To determine different stakeholders, their position, and their relationships in the rangelands co-management process, the current study attempts to combine stakeholder analysis and social network analysis. Therefore, a combined approach including interview and survey was used for data collection. First, the stakeholders who were involved in the rangelands' exploitation and management were identified. The identified stakeholders in this study consisted of 48 governmental and non-governmental organizations in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Later, the characteristics of different stakeholders, including the amount of power, interests, knowledge, information sharing, and their satisfaction in the rangelands' exploitation and management were analyzed; afterwards, the structure of the social network (conflict and participation relations) among the stakeholders was examined. It was found that in the rangelands exploitation and management, the conflict among stakeholders was relatively higher than the participation among them. The results of the study present valuable information to managers who attempt to enhance stakeholder participation, while avoiding or mitigating conflict.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198942300207X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02572; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164335897&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235198942300207X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02572
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know