Machine learning and high-throughput computational screening of hydrophobic metal–organic frameworks for capture of formaldehyde from air
Green Energy & Environment, ISSN: 2468-0257, Vol: 6, Issue: 5, Page: 759-770
2021
- 52Citations
- 73Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Aiming to efficiently capture the formaldehyde (HCHO) with low content in the air exceeding the standard, 31,399 hydrophobic metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) were first selected from 137,953 hypothetical MOFs to calculate their formaldehyde adsorption performance, namely, adsorption capacity ( N HCHO ) and selectivity ( SHCHO/N2+O2 ) by molecular simulation and machine learning (ML). To combine the SHCHO/N2+O2 and N HCHO, a new performance metric, the tradeoff between selectivity and capacity (TSC) was proposed to identify more reasonably the top-performing MOFs. The MOFs were divided into three datasets (i.e., all of the MOFs (AM), MOFs with top 5% of SHCHO/N2+O2 (P S ) and MOFs with top 5% of N HCHO (P N )) to scrutinize and explore the characteristics of different materials capturing formaldehyde from the air (N 2 and O 2 ). Furthermore, after four ML algorithms (the back propagation neural network (BPNN), support vector machine (SVM), extreme learning machine (ELM), and random forest (RF)) are applied to quantitatively assess the prediction effects of performance indexes in different datasets, RF algorithm with the most accurate prediction revealed that the TSC has strong correlations with the MOF descriptors in P S dataset. In view of 14.10% of the promising MOFs occupied P N, the design paths of excellent adsorbents for six MOF descriptors were quantitatively determined, especially for the Henry's coefficient ( K HCHO ) and heat of adsorption of formaldehyde ( Q 0 st ). Their probabilities of obtaining excellent MOFs could reach 100% and 77.42%, respectively, and both the relative importance and the trends of univariate analysis coherently confirm the important positions of K HCHO and Q 0 st. Finally, 20 best MOFs were identified for the single-step separation of formaldehyde with low concentration. The microscopic insights and structure-performance relationship predictions from this computational and ML study are useful toward the development of new MOFs for the capture of formaldehyde from air.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468025720300972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2020.06.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103408419&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468025720300972; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2468025720300972?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2468025720300972?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2020.06.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know