Fecal colonization, phenotypic and genotypic characterization of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates in transplant patients in Shiraz Nemazee and Abu Ali Sina Hospitals
Gene Reports, ISSN: 2452-0144, Vol: 25, Page: 101321
2021
- 2Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The current work aimed at investigating the intestinal carriage of Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC), determining the clonal relatedness, phylogroups and adhesion factors among ESBL-EC strains obtained from rectal swabs from transplant patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital. This cross-sectional study was conducted during February to August of 2020 in Shiraz, Iran. Rectal swabs (RS) were randomly collected from transplant patients. The combination disk was used as a phenotypic method to detect ESBL-producing strains. PCR was performed for the genotypic detection of ESBL and adhesion factors, classify the phylogenetic group of each ESBL-EC strain and major sequence types (STs). A total of 118 E. coli isolates were collected from rectal swab from hospitalized transplant patients. Among them, 37.9% (49/118) patients were colonized with ESBL isolates. The majority of the isolates were from kidney transplant patients (29/49, 59.2%). Overall, of the 49 isolates identified as ESBL-producers, 42 (85.7%) isolates harbored the bla CTX-M gene. The detection of the different pathotypes from 49 ESBL-producer isolates showed that the most prevalent pathotype was STEC (32.7%). According to the multiplex PCR results, most (42.8%) of the ESBL-producer isolates belonged to phylogroup B 2. The most frequent sequence type (ST) among E. coli isolates was ST131 (26.5%). Our study revealed high production of ESBL-encoding genes with bla CTX-M as the most predominant gene, moreover, it revealed high intestinal colonization with ST131 ESBL-EC. Therefore, to reduce and prevent the spread of ESBL-EC, early detection of fecal carriage at the beginning of admission in clinical settings especially in immunocompromised patients is recommended.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245201442100306X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101321; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122664092&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S245201442100306X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101321
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know