Tracing sediment sources in two paired agricultural catchments with different riparian forest and wetland proportion in southern Brazil
Geoderma, ISSN: 0016-7061, Vol: 285, Page: 225-239
2017
- 21Citations
- 74Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Riparian forest and wetlands act as a barrier that can reduce sediment transfer from crop fields to the water bodies. The present study investigated the sediment source contribution in two paired agricultural catchments with different proportions of riparian vegetation and wetlands, and similar proportion of crop fields, by using the fingerprinting approach. This study was carried out in two catchments from an agrarian reform settlement in Southern Brazil (JC80 – 80.2 ha, and JC140 - 142.6 ha). Sediment sources evaluated were crop fields, streambanks, unpaved roads, and grasslands. Suspended sediments samples were collected during nine storm-events from April 2011 to October 2013. The average contribution of sediment sources in JC80 was 16 ± 19% crop fields, 49 ± 26% streambanks, 15 ± 14% unpaved roads, and 20 ± 22% grasslands, while in JC140 it was 11 ± 12% crop fields, 23 ± 14% streambanks, 41 ± 19% unpaved roads, and 25 ± 14% grasslands. Preserved riparian vegetation, wetlands, and artificial ponds promote sediment trapping and reduce connectivity between cropland and streams, decreasing the amount of sediments transferred to the water bodies. Moreover, the findings from this work also suggest that unpaved road contributions depend on the number of junctions between roads and the stream network.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706116306000; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992091943&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016706116306000; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know