Expert-based maps and highly detailed surface drainage models to support digital soil mapping
Geoderma, ISSN: 0016-7061, Vol: 384, Page: 114779
2021
- 9Citations
- 73Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Soil maps are an important tool for agricultural planning and land management. Digital techniques have been used to create soil maps. However, most studies did not explore drainage network (DN) information on prediction models, which are related to soil variability. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the contribution of DN to predict soil classes using digital soil mapping techniques. We used a conventional soil class map (1:20,000) and environmental variables, such as drainage and relief attributes and satellite images, aiming to extrapolate the soil map to a larger area. The work was conducted in São Paulo State, Brazil. We created a point grid with 30 × 30 m resolution to extract the soil and variables information. We used these data to calibrate a random forest model along with cross-validation to optimize the model selection. The predicted soil classes for the 53,800-ha study area were determined on two levels according to the World Reference Base (WRB) soil classification system. The first level considered only soil groups (i.e. Acrisol and Ferralsol), while the second level considered the soil group and a qualifier (i.e. Chromic Acrisol and Rhodic Acrisol). We validated the maps using other conventional soils maps (internal validation) and field sampling points (external validation). After extrapolating the soil map, we validated the model s performance using field observations. In this case, the method reached an accuracy of 0.56 and kappa of 0.31 for the soil’s first level, and 0.38 and 0.25 for the second level. Regosols and Cambisols prediction was underestimated, lowering the accuracy and kappa results on the validation. However, Ferralsols reached accuracy and Acrisols reached around 70% accuracy. The drainage related attributes had the highest contribution to the model’s performance (accuracy = 56%) and improved the soil map extrapolation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706120325349; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114779; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096199232&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016706120325349; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114779
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know