Evaluating the reliability of UAV-based carbon dioxide measurements in the lower troposphere
Geomatica, ISSN: 1195-1036, Vol: 76, Issue: 2, Page: 100032
2024
- 1Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Vertical profiles of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) were captured in rural Ontario, Canada, using an Aeroqual Series 500 monitor mounted onboard an Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Measurements at various altitudes within the Transport Canada regulations height limit (5 m – 95 m) were compared to simultaneous measurements taken by an identical sensor at ground-level. Results demonstrate a high degree of agreement between onboard and ground-level observations, with a mean different of −6.02 ppm, and the majority of differences falling within the sensor’s factory calibration accuracy ( ± 10 ppm + 5 %). The study also demonstrates the ability to capture the homogeneity of CO 2 in the lower troposphere, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) exceeding 0.75 at all altitudes, without the addition of turbulence by UAV flight. The vertical profiles captured in this study validate the use of UAV-based measurements for understanding the distribution and transport of greenhouse gases near the surface of the Earth. This research has implications for routine air quality monitoring to improve atmospheric models, environmental impact assessments and the development of targeted emission reduction strategies.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know