Assessment of herbaceous ornamental plant species as potential remediation agents for cadmium contaminated environments
Journal of Geochemical Exploration, ISSN: 0375-6742, Vol: 256, Page: 107333
2024
- 4Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Industrial development has led to the pollution of lands with Cadmium (Cd), resulting in the contamination of edible crops and posing significant health risks to humans and animals. To address this issue, the selection of non-edible ornamental plants has been considered. In this study, a lab-scale experiment was conducted using five different ornamental plant species: Tabermaeontana divaricata L., Syngonium podophyllum Schott, Asparagus setaceus (Kunth) Jessop, Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. and Portulaca grandiflora Hook. These plant species were treated 100 mL of 5 mg L −1 CdSO 4 solution, continuing for 30 days in hydroponic medium with replenishment with same solution on every 3rd day. The main objective was to identify ornamental plant species with high tolerance and remarkable Cd translocation and accumulation power. The plants were evaluated based on their Tolerance Index (TI), Translocation factor (TF) and Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) toward Cd in the hydroponic medium. P. grandiflora exhibited high tolerance to Cd with 95 % TI and S. podophyllum (TI – 85 %) and T. divaricata (TI – 62 %) showed limited tolerance while C. roseus and A. setaceus were found to be more sensitive. Moreover, Cd presence was also found to induce a hormetic response in P. grandiflora, T. divaricata, and S. podophyllum. Based on their TF and BAF values, P. grandiflora (TF-5.45; BAF-0.86) and S. podophyllum (TF-4.49; BAF-0.85) were identified as potential candidates for phytoextraction, while T. divaricata (TF-0.007; BAF-4.34) showed potential as a phytostabilizer of Cd. These findings propose for the utilization of these ornamental plants for the remediation of the Cd-contaminated soil and water, with the harvested biomass potentially serving as bio-ore for recovery of Cd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674223001802; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107333; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85175740135&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0375674223001802; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107333
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know