Intelligent mapping of geochemical anomalies: Adaptation of DBSCAN and mean-shift clustering approaches
Journal of Geochemical Exploration, ISSN: 0375-6742, Vol: 258, Page: 107393
2024
- 29Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Cluster analysis can be used to organize samples and generate ideas regarding the multivariate geochemistry of given dataset. Traditional clustering techniques have the drawbacks of high computational complexity and poor adaptability to big data. Hence, there has recently been much focus on creating better clustering algorithms. Although many clustering algorithms have been applied, and some produce notable clustering results, the performance efficiency of algorithms is often highly dependent on the values the user chooses for the parameters. Currently, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise clustering (DBSCAN) is widely utilized in image processing, bioinformatics, and social network analysis owing to its ability to detect clusters of various shapes. Even though partitional clustering techniques may be effective when the number of clusters K is known in advance, they cannot implement non-convex clustering and rapidly return to a local optimum. This study proposes the concept of DBSCAN clustering for stream sediment geochemical data. In this respect, the geochemical data collected from Varcheh district, SW Iran, were processed using the clr transformation before applying DBSCAN. Then, PCA was used to minimize the dimension of variables and specify the mineralization-related elements. In the following, one of the PCs connected with mineralization (PC2) was chosen for further analysis. DBSCAB, Mean-shift and Fuzzy K-means algorithms were used to monitor the multi-element geochemical anomalies linked to MVT Pb Zn deposits in the study area. According to Davies-Bouldin and Silhouette as two validation metrics, it can be deduced that the three SCB models are advantageous, however, the model generated by DBSCAN is preferable to the model generated by Mean-shift and Fuzzy K-means.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674224000098; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107393; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182872632&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0375674224000098; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107393
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know