Systematic evidence-based review: The application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies
Genetics in Medicine, ISSN: 1098-3600, Vol: 24, Issue: 7, Page: 1379-1391
2022
- 54Citations
- 52Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes51
- 51
- CrossRef13
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Captures52
- Readers52
- 52
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- News3
Most Recent News
ACMG Strongly Recommends NIPS for Common Fetal Trisomies
Citing superior accuracy, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) published a new practice guideline that “strongly recommends” the use of non-invasive prenatal
Review Description
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in high-risk populations. This systematic evidence review evaluates NIPS performance in a general-risk population. Medline (PubMed) and Embase were used to identify studies examining detection of Down syndrome (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, copy number variants, and maternal conditions, as well as studies assessing the psychological impact of NIPS and the rate of subsequent diagnostic testing. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled estimates of NIPS performance ( P <.05). Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was assessed. A total of 87 studies met inclusion criteria. Diagnostic odds ratios were significant ( P <.0001) for T21, T18, and T13 for singleton and twin pregnancies. NIPS was accurate (≥99.78%) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies. Performance for rare autosomal trisomies and copy number variants was variable. Use of NIPS reduced diagnostic tests by 31% to 79%. Conclusions regarding psychosocial outcomes could not be drawn owing to lack of data. Identification of maternal conditions was rare. NIPS is a highly accurate screening method for T21, T18, and T13 in both singleton and twin pregnancies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360022007146; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134667482&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608568; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1098360022007146; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know