Analyzing digital government partnerships: An institutional logics perspective
Government Information Quarterly, ISSN: 0740-624X, Vol: 42, Issue: 1, Page: 101987
2025
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Digital government is transforming public service provision through collaboration between governments and companies. However, establishing digital government partnerships is complex and challenging, with governments often lacking a clear view of the influencing factors in various configurations and their underlying logics. Based on the theory of institutional logics, this study discusses the state, market, and corporation logic in digital government partnerships, and identifies six influencing factors. Employing a multiple qualitative comparative analysis method, the analysis of 31 provincial regions in Chinese mainland over five years derived 19 solutions that lead to a high digital government performance. These findings reveal the causal relationships between the configurational strategies for digital government partnerships and the different outcomes in terms of digital government performance. A series of propositions are derived to explain the logic multiplicity behind the configurations. This study theorizes the configurational relationships of the influencing factors and their underlying logics to enhance the understanding of the intricate diversity and dynamics exhibited within digital government partnerships.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000790; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101987; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85211172236&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0740624X24000790; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101987
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know