A win-win partnership for affordable homeownership solutions by connecting responsible investors, community housing providers, and government
Habitat International, ISSN: 0197-3975, Vol: 134, Page: 102781
2023
- 4Citations
- 87Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Many studies have examined the affordable housing sector from the welfare perspective, but no study has discussed the sector's investment perspective. Therefore, this study presents new evidence of the governance and downside protection relating to the affordable housing sector and contributes to the limited literature on the performance of socially responsible investments. First, we identified the specific risk management and corporate governance practices of the affordable housing sector in Australia by conducting focus-group discussions with industry experts. The sector's strong governance helps to attract responsible investors by reducing investment risk and guaranteeing environmental and social outcomes. Second, by analyzing the downside risk and risk-adjusted returns such as the Sortino ratio and excess return to value at risk, we show that investing in low-priced houses has more downside protection while still offering higher risk-adjusted returns, than high-priced houses and selected responsible investments in Australia. We also find that investing in low-priced houses can improve the portfolio performance of responsible investors. Therefore, we conclude that the affordable homeownership programs in Australia have the potential to attract responsible investments and so increase the supply of much-needed affordable houses.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397523000413; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102781; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149447226&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0197397523000413; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102781
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know