ChatGPT in finance: Applications, challenges, and solutions
Heliyon, ISSN: 2405-8440, Vol: 10, Issue: 2, Page: e24890
2024
- 23Citations
- 94Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef13
- Captures94
- Readers94
- 94
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- News3
Most Recent News
ChatGPT Operator: How Contextual And Specialized AI Transform Work?
OpenAI’s ChatGPT Operator, marks a meaningful step forward for the development of AI agent, designed to handle specialized tasks with versatility. Unlike general-purpose AI models,
Article Description
The emergence of ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence tool, has sparked a revolution in the finance industry, enabling individuals to interact with technology in natural language. However, the use of ChatGPT in finance presents a profound array of ethical considerations that demand careful scrutiny to ensure its responsible and ethical use. After a concise exploration of ChatGPT's applications in finance, this policy article delves into the ethical challenges arising from the use of ChatGPT in finance, including outcomes contaminated with biases, incorporation of fake information in the financial decisions, concerns surrounding privacy and security, lack of transparency and accountability in the decision-making processes and financial services, human job displacement, and the intricate web of legal complexities. Our article asserts that financial institutions employing ChatGPT must proactively devise strategies to confront these burgeoning challenges, mitigating their adverse effects on both individuals and society as a whole. Additionally, we propose relevant policies to tackle these ethical quandaries head-on. In essence, this article illuminates the imperative need for a meticulous ethical framework, facilitating an informed and responsible use of ChatGPT in the realm of finance, safeguarding the welfare of individuals and society. While our work significantly contributes to the research and practice of finance, we also identify future research avenues.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024009216; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24890; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183626895&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38304767; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844024009216; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24890
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know