RETRACTED: Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) as a key player in the production of oil-based paint against biofilm and other activities
Heliyon, ISSN: 2405-8440, Vol: 10, Issue: 9, Page: e29758
2024
- 1Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier policy on article withdrawal ( https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/article-withdrawal ). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. Post publication an investigation conducted on behalf of the journal by Elsevier's Research Integrity & Publishing Ethics team found phrases that make some passages in the article difficult to parse. The authors were requested to explain the use of these passages of text but were unable to do so. The Editor has lost confidence in the findings of the article and has determined that it should be retracted. The authors disagree with retraction and dispute the grounds for it.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402405789X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29758; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191533227&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38720728; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S240584402405789X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29758
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know