PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Pruning techniques affect flowering, fruiting, yield and fruit biochemical traits in guava under transitory sub-tropical conditions

Heliyon, ISSN: 2405-8440, Vol: 10, Issue: 9, Page: e30064
2024
  • 5
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 11
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Research Results from Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University Update Knowledge of Science and Technology (Pruning techniques affect flowering, fruiting, yield and fruit biochemical traits in guava under transitory sub-tropical ...)

2024 MAY 13 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Life Science Daily -- New research on science and technology is the

Article Description

Production of quality fruits in the dry and low humid October–May period has been a challenge in the tropics and sub-tropics having wide weather fluctuations throughout the year. Henceforth, the research aimed at investigating the seasonal variations in vegetative developments as well as flowering, fruiting, yield, and fruit quality of guava emphasizing the off-seasonality by pruning 0 cm (control), 15 cm, 30 cm, and 45 cm from shoot-tip, once a year at spring (early March), monsoon (early June) and autumn (early September) under such atmospheric implications. Yearly and quarterly documentation at wet (June–August and September–November) and dry (December–February and March–May) seasons revealed that pruning in spring and autumn exhibited statistical parity for higher yearly yield of 31.71 kg and 31.58 kg plant −1, respectively. Moreover, spring pruning had maximum yield in the wet season (23.94 kg plant −1 ), while autumn pruning governed the dry season production (18.11 kg plant −1 ) having a notable wet period yield (13.47 kg plant −1 ). Considering the yearly and quarterly in March–May and December–February harvests, autumn pruning exhibited statistical supremacy for total soluble solids, titratable acidity, total sugar, vitamin C, and specific gravity. However, pruning time didn't influence the fruit physiochemical traits at the June–August and September–November quarters producing fruits of inferior quality compared to those of March–May and December–February harvests. On the other hand, pruning lengths of 30 cm and 45 cm demonstrated statistical consistency for auspicious vegetative, reproductive and fruit biochemical properties. Meanwhile, 30 cm pruning produced maximum number of flowers (224.71 plant −1 ) and fruits (155.89 plant −1 ), consequently the highest yield (38.38 kg plant −1 ). Treatment interactions too ascertained that off-season production of superior quality guava can be enhanced by 30 cm shoot-tip pruning in autumn without compromising the year-round harvests.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know