Student perspectives on preferences and reported instructor practices of written feedback in the Moroccan EFL university context
Heliyon, ISSN: 2405-8440, Vol: 10, Issue: 11, Page: e31694
2024
- 31Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Data from University of Szeged Advance Knowledge in Science and Technology (Student perspectives on preferences and reported instructor practices of written feedback in the Moroccan EFL university context)
2024 JUN 10 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Science Daily -- Investigators publish new report on science and technology. According
Article Description
Written feedback (WF) in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing has been explored from two perspectives, including product-based WF, which is provided on completed drafts, and process-based WF, which can be used during pre-, while-, and post-writing. Students’ perceptions have been mainly investigated in relation to product-oriented WF preferences and practices, but not in comparison to the two WF approaches. This exploratory quantitative study examined students’ preferences and reported instructor practices of the product and the process approaches of WF in the higher education EFL writing context. Data were collected from 468 Moroccan students through a questionnaire covering the characteristics of the two WF types using nine different subscales, enabling several comparisons during data analysis. Four principal component analyses were employed to validate the questionnaire. The data and sampling in each case were appropriate for factor analysis (0.78 ≤ KMO ≤0.93). Reliability values (0.71 ≤ Cronbach’s alpha ≤0.95) were acceptable. 1) Students reported higher preferences for receiving written corrective feedback; effective WF modes containing specific, personalized, and detailed WF supporting the identification of the next steps in the writing process; and content-based WF related to macroaspects (e.g., the range of ideas and the development and relevance of a topic, purpose, genre, context, and audience). 2) Moreover, they reported that their instructors used these approaches more often than other WF techniques. 3) However, there were discrepancies between the two constructs in the case of all subscales. Students perceived that mostly all the techniques of the two approaches of WF are of great importance in EFL writing classes; however, they mostly all reported that, in comparison to their preferences, instructors applied them less frequently. The study suggests adapting instructor WF practices to students’ preferences to effectively develop their writing skills.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024077259; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31694; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193851080&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38845856; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844024077259; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31694
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know