Efficacy of rituximab in treating steroid-resistant Graves’ orbitopathy in active moderate-to-severe and sight-threatening forms: A retrospective observation from China

The efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating steroid-resistant Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) has been limitedly studied in Asians. Moreover, RTX has been considered even less for patients with steroid-resistant dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) who failed to undergo orbital decompression surgery for physical or financial reasons, or who responded poorly to the procedure. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of RTX in treating steroid-resistant active moderate-to-severe and sight-threatening GO in a Chinese population. Data from 28 patients with steroid-resistant GO prescribed a single dose of 500 mg RTX were retrospectively retrieved. Treatment responses and contributing factors were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 22 (8–34) weeks. 23 (82.1 %) patients had a positive objective outcome recommended by the European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO), while 25 (92.6 %) had a decrease in 7-item clinical activity score (CAS) by at least 2. Diplopia, visual dysfunction, and MRI-detected T2 relaxation time of the involved extraocular muscles improved significantly at the last follow-up compared to baseline (81.0 % vs. 47.6 %, 38.9 % vs. 16.7 %, and 87.8 (8.64) vs. 75.8 (10.9) ms, respectively; all p values < 0.05). No significant improvement was seen in terms of proptosis and eye muscle duction. Notably, a higher baseline IgG4 to IgG ratio was a predictor for RTX-induced positive EUGOGO outcomes. After RTX treatment, all 8 patients with DON demonstrated inactivation, and 4 improved in visual acuity by ≥ 1 line. No patient with DON experienced obvious deterioration. A single dose of 500 mg RTX seemed to be an effective and tolerable treatment for steroid-resistant GO. However, larger-scale studies with a control group are required for a more solid conclusion. The role of RTX in steroid-resistant DON management where surgery is unavailable or ineffective should be further explored.