PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Data-driven water quality prediction for wastewater treatment plants

Heliyon, ISSN: 2405-8440, Vol: 10, Issue: 18, Page: e36940
2024
  • 7
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 15
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    7
    • Citation Indexes
      7
  • Captures
    15
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1

Most Recent News

Reports from University of Anbar Describe Recent Advances in Machine Learning (Data-driven water quality prediction for wastewater treatment plants)

2024 SEP 20 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Information Technology Daily -- A new study on artificial intelligence is now available.

Article Description

Monitoring and managing wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is crucial for environmental protection. The presection of the quality of treated water is essential for energy efficient operation. The current research presents a comprehensive comparison of machine learning models for water quality parameter prediction in WWTPs. Four machine learning models presented in MLP, GFFR, MLP-PCA, and RBF were employed in this study. The primary notion of this study is to apply the proposed models using two distinct modeling scenarios. The first scenario represents a straightforward approach by utilizing the inputs and outputs of WWTPs; meanwhile, the second scenario involves using multi-step modeling techniques, which incorporate intermediate outputs induced by primary and secondary settlers. The study also investigates the potential of the adopted models to handle high dimensional data as a result of the multi-step modeling since more data points and outputs are progressively integrated at each step. The results show that the GFFR model outperforms the other models across both scenarios, specifically in the second scenario in predicting conductivity (COND) by providing higher correlation accuracy (R = 0.893) and lower prediction deviations (NRMSE = 0.091 and NMAE = 0.071). However, all models across both scenarios struggle to predict the other water quality parameters, generating significantly lower prediction correlations and higher prediction deviations. Nonetheless, the innovative multi-step technique in scenario two has significantly boosted the prediction capacity of all models, with improvement ranging from 0.2 % to 157 % and an average of 60 %. The implementation of AI models has proven its ability to accomplish high accuracy for WQ parameter prediction, highlighting the impact of leveraging intermediate process data.

Bibliographic Details

Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin; Melini Wan Mohtar, Wan Hanna; Khaleel, Faidhalrahman; Kamel, Ammar Hatem; Mansoor, Saif Saad; Alsultani, Riyadh; Ahmed, Ali Najah; Sherif, Mohsen; El-Shafie, Ahmed

Elsevier BV

Multidisciplinary

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know