A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance
Heliyon, ISSN: 2405-8440, Vol: 10, Issue: 23, Page: e40575
2024
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Sirnak University Researchers Update Understanding of Sustainable Energy (A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance)
2024 DEC 09 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Energy Daily News -- New study results on sustainable energy have been published.
Review Description
This review examines Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technology, which generates electricity using organic fluids at low temperature ranges. To enhance the efficiency of basic ORC systems, they are often adapted into Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (R-ORC) systems. The review highlights the dimensions of economic, energy, and exergy efficiency, which are critical for practical application. Factors like the choice of working fluid, heat source temperature, and heat exchanger efficiency significantly affect economic feasibility; suboptimal choices can reduce returns and hinder project viability. Strategic decisions can improve economic outcomes and make ORC technology more appealing, as improved efficiency often leads to better economic performance through increased energy output and reduced operational costs. ORC and R-ORC systems promote sustainable energy production by enhancing energy efficiency in various applications, including geothermal power plants, industrial waste heat recovery, biomass energy production, and solar power plants. By enabling electricity generation even at low temperatures, these systems efficiently utilize existing energy sources, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, and minimize environmental impacts, thus providing both economic and ecological benefits. Additionally, when the studies conducted are examined, R-ORC exhibits higher performance than basic ORC. R-ORC is significantly superior to ORC in terms of both energy and exergy efficiency. Specifically, in terms of energy efficiency, R-ORC has been found to be 1.83 %–25.5 % more efficient. Regarding exergy efficiency, R-ORC demonstrates approximately 7.69 % better performance. Furthermore, due to these increases in efficiency, it has been determined that R-ORC also provides a more positive economic contribution compared to ORC. Thus, comparisons between ORC and R-ORC systems play a significant role in sustainable energy production and offer valuable guidance for future research. The limitations of ORC and R-ORC systems include limited efficiency due to low temperature differentials, the environmental impact of the organic fluids used, and high costs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024166066; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40575; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85209892640&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39654714; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844024166066
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know