Three decades of research on Centella asiatica : Insights and future trends from bibliometric analysis
Journal of Herbal Medicine, ISSN: 2210-8033, Vol: 39, Page: 100662
2023
- 3Citations
- 60Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. (CA; Family: Apiaceae) remains a major herb in the indigenous medicines of many Asian and African countries. Scientists have been delving deeper to fully understand the rationale for the various anecdotal therapeutic claims ascribed to its usage. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the published research on CA within the past three decades. The original articles and conference papers on CA research between 1991 and 2021 indexed on the Scopus® database were retrieved and analyzed by VOSviewer® software. The ∼2000 published research articles have been cited > 38,000 times in the period under study. The dominance of India, Malaysia, China, Thailand, and Indonesia out of the 81 countries that contributed to CA research is obvious. These Asian countries altogether contributed more than two-thirds of the publication count. However, the Italian scientist, Belcaro GV affiliated with the Università Degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti – Pescara, Italy led the individual pack with 26 publications on CA while Kim OT of the Rural Development Administration, South Korea is the most cited author with 532 citations. The Thai universities – Chulalongkorn, Mahidol, Khon Kaen, Prince of Songkla, and Chiang Mai are actively involved in the research on CA having published ∼7 % of the total outputs and citations within the last 31 years. The primary focus of the research on CA has been its efficacy in the management of wound healing and other chronic conditions. Recent investigations are expanding into cosmetics, phytoremediation, and food packaging.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803323000404; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2023.100662; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159573424&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210803323000404; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2023.100662
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know