Plant species as a therapeutic resource and cultural reservoir: A case study from Southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Journal of Herbal Medicine, ISSN: 2210-8033, Vol: 42, Page: 100758
2023
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Review Description
This study assesses the traditional use of native plant species in mono-herbal and polyherbal recipe formulations for health care in the Karak district, Southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The initial surveys were performed using structured questionnaires and informal interviews with 110 key respondents in the studied region. Use value (VU), fidelity level and Informants’ Consensus Factor (ICF) were assessed for each medicinal plant species. A total of 86 plant species of 39 families were recorded for 29 different therapeutic potentials based on their Use Value (UV), Fidelity Level (FL%), Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) and Preference Ranking Practice (PRP). UV was recorded between 0.49 and 0.08. The highly utilized part of plants in mono-herbal recipe formulation for numerous ailments was fruits (35%) followed by leaves (26%), seeds (14%) and roots (7%). The highest FL value was reported for Aloe vera (69.2) followed by Calotropis procera (65). At the same time, the highest ICF value was reported for blood pressure (0.96). According to PRP results, Ziziphus jujuba Mill ranked first due to multiple uses facing severe anthropogenic pressure. The most popular administration method was oral. The study reveals the rich polyherbal knowledge in the studied region possesses in traditional medicine. Some of the mono-ingredient recipes were observed with similar uses for most plants in other parts of the country, but polyherbal remedies were unique without any similar reports from the entire southern region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803323001367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2023.100758; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85172875234&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210803323001367; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2023.100758
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know