Cardiovascular Three-Dimensional Printing in Non-Congenital Percutaneous Interventions
Heart, Lung and Circulation, ISSN: 1443-9506, Vol: 28, Issue: 10, Page: 1525-1534
2019
- 20Citations
- 79Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef7
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
The application of 3D printing in preoperative planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
Abstract Background Recently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been suggested as a less invasive treatment compared to surgical aortic valve replacement, for patients with
Review Description
Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is emerging as a potential new tool for the planning of medical interventions. In the last few years, increasing data have accumulated on its ability to guide interventional cardiology procedures, going beyond initial reports in congenital heart disease settings. In fact, there is compelling evidence on the advantages of a 3D-printed guided strategy for left atrial appendage closure, suggesting a high success rate with optimal device selection and lower radiation load. Furthermore, there is emerging experience in aortic root printing, which may improve the success rate and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and may be of particular interest for targeting low-risk populations. Additionally, there are stimulating reports in mitral valve intervention, setting the tone for this new field in cardiovascular percutaneous intervention. In this clinically oriented paper, we will review current 3D printing use in interventional cardiology and we will address future directions, with a focus on procedural planning and medical simulation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950619304755; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.04.020; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066428337&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31176626; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1443950619304755; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.04.020
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know