Global approaches to cardiogenetic evaluation after sudden cardiac death in the young: A survey among health care professionals
Heart Rhythm, ISSN: 1547-5271, Vol: 18, Issue: 10, Page: 1637-1644
2021
- 10Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
Thorough investigation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in those aged 1–40 years commonly reveals a heritable cause, yet access to postmortem genetic testing is variable. The purpose of this study was to explore practices of postmortem genetic testing and attitudes of health care professionals worldwide. A survey was administered among health care professionals recruited through professional associations, social media, and networks of researchers. Topics included practices around postmortem genetic testing, level of confidence in health care professionals’ ability, and attitudes toward postmortem genetic testing practices. There were 112 respondents, with 93% from North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand, and 7% from South America, Asia and Africa. Only 30% reported autopsy as mandatory, and overall practices were largely case by case and not standardized. North American respondents (87%) more often perceived practices as ineffective compared to those from Europe (58%) and Australia/New Zealand (48%; P =.002). Where a heritable cause is suspected, 69% considered postmortem genetic testing and 61% offered genetic counseling to surviving family members. Financial resources varied widely. Half of participants believed practices in their countries perpetuated health inequalities. Postmortem genetic testing is not consistently available in the investigation of young SCD despite being a recommendation in international guidelines. Access to postmortem genetic testing, which is critical in ascertaining a cause of death in many cases, must be guided by well-resourced, multidisciplinary teams.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527121003088; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.037; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104282642&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781984; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1547527121003088; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.037
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know