Electrical and mechanical interventricular dyssynchrony coupling in patients with bradycardia: A UHF-ECG validation trial
Heart Rhythm, ISSN: 1547-5271
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG) is a noninvasive tool visualizing the ventricular activation sequence. It was never compared with other methods of dyssynchrony assessment in patients with bradycardia. We aimed to compare UHF-ECG interventricular electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) with interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) measured by echocardiography in patients receiving right ventricular pacing (RVP) or conduction system pacing (CSP). Fifty-three patients with advanced atrioventricular conduction disease and preserved ventricular systolic function were prospectively assigned to RVP (n=32 [60 %]) or CSP (n=21 [40 %]). IVMD was measured as the time difference between left ventricular and right ventricular preejection periods. Interventricular e-DYS was calculated by software as the time difference between activation in V 1 and V 7 chest electrodes using UHF-ECG. The median age of patients was 75 (interquartile range 72–80) years, and both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Baseline IVMD and interventricular e-DYS were similar in the entire population (−2 [−8 to 5] ms vs−1 [−6 to 5] ms, respectively; P =.52). Both methods showed the same dyssynchrony trends after pacemaker implantation; that is, while both IVMD and interventricular e-DYS increased in the RVP group (IVMD 28 [23–33] ms vs interventricular e-DYS 26 [19–33] ms; P =.99), they remained low in the CSP group (IVMD −7 [−16 to 2] ms vs interventricular e-DYS −5 [−12 to 2] ms; P =.91). There was a moderate overall correlation between IVMD and interventricular e-DYS for all studied ventricular rhythms ( R =0.74). UHF-ECG noninvasively expresses interventricular dyssynchrony from V 7 –V 1 chest leads with similar results to echocardiography. RVP increases interventricular dyssynchrony, while CSP preserves synchronous ventricular activation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125002012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.031; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=86000729096&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39988106; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1547527125002012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.031
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know