Measurements of regolith thicknesses on Enceladus: Uncovering the record of plume activity
Icarus, ISSN: 0019-1035, Vol: 392, Page: 115369
2023
- 8Citations
- 18Captures
- 10Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Saturn’s moon Enceladus wears a thick blanket of snow
Saturn’s moon Enceladus is blanketed in a thick layer of snow. In some places, the downy stuff would be deep enough to bury nearly any
Article Description
Tectonic pit chains are geologic landforms that form in loose unconsolidated regolith and are observed on many solar system bodies. In the outer solar system pit chains are most clearly observed on Enceladus. In this paper, we test three techniques for using pit chain morphometry to probe the regolith thickness across Enceladus accumulated as fall-back from its plume eruptions. We favor the precision of the Slope Angle Method (SAM), allowing for spatially related heterogeneities in regolith characteristics, and we measured regolith thicknesses up to 700 m (mean = 250 m, n = 116). We combine models of plume deposition rates with observed regolith thicknesses and assume lunar-like crater-generated regolith production. We constrain the time needed to deposit the observed sequences of regolith to extrapolate the age of the plume source and its liquid reservoir. The porosity and density of the plume-generated regolith are unconstrained parameters that affect the rate at which the regolith is deposited. Assuming a constant deposition mass flux, we explored the parameter space of regolith density (0.02–0.92 g/cm 3 ) and porosity (0–90%) that would deposit a thick enough regolith to match the pit chain observations. Only by using the lowest density (0.2 g/cm 3 ) and highest porosity (90%) are we able to reproduce the maximum regolith thicknesses within the age of the solar system. We interpret the long deposition times needed to match regolith thicknesses to suggest that Enceladus's mass flux from the plume needs to have been significantly higher, that the regolith is possibly a low-density/high-porosity material, and/or additional regolith-forming processes (like alternative vent localities) exist, or have existed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103522004614; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115369; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143845264&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019103522004614; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115369
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know