Assessment of a low-cost LED vein detection method
IFAC-PapersOnLine, ISSN: 2405-8963, Vol: 53, Issue: 2, Page: 15976-15981
2020
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Venepuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in medical healthcare worldwide, however failure rates are still relatively high, particularly for paediatric, geriatric, darker skinned, and obese patients. Visualisation of the veins has been shown to decrease failure rates and can be achieved through trans-illumination, near infrared reflectance, or sonography. However, these techniques are either not reliable or very expensive, resulting in them not being commonly used in the clinical workplace. This paper develops a proof of concept low-cost LED vein detection device using photocurrent generated by LEDs in reverse bias. The prototype uses two emitting LEDs and one detecting LED to identify the location of a vein via trans-illuminance and reflectance. Various light intensities and wavelengths of the LEDs are tested in regard to resolution, noise, and signal peaks. A balance between system noise and resolution is identified for each LED in relation to the emitted intensity. No significant difference was observed in relative peak height when different wavelengths were used to identify the same superficial veins. The initial proof of concept proves the LED vein detection method and provides the foundation for further low-cost LED vein detection devices to be developed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896320306765; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.390; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119663682&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405896320306765; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.390
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know