On Expressive Features for Gait Analysis using Lower Limb Inertial Sensor Data
IFAC-PapersOnLine, ISSN: 2405-8963, Vol: 53, Issue: 2, Page: 15990-15997
2020
- 3Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, we present a method to obtain explicit, expressive and interpretable gait feature signals from an inertial sensor, mounted on any segment of the lower limbs. The proposed method is invariant to the mounting orientation of the sensor, works without magnetometer information, requires no prior knowledge and can be used in real-time scenarios. Moreover, the constructed signals are robust for a wide variety of changing walking speeds and directions. We investigate the informational content of our three feature signals lying in the human sagittal plane with respect to the gait phase segmentation problem and compare them to other commonly used signals, such as the sagittal angular velocity and the norms of accelerations and angular velocities. To this end, we make use of the filter-based maximum relevance minimum redundancy algorithm, which is a classifier-independent feature selection method. For validating our approach, we consider gait data of twelve healthy subjects walking straight and in curves at self-chosen speeds with inertial sensors attached to either the thigh, shank or foot. Additionally, pressure measuring insoles are used to obtain ground truth toe-off and heel-strike gait events for reference. With those events as the gait phase transitions, the event detection is cast into a classification problem. To support the theoretical findings of the feature selection and ranking, we finally evaluate different choices of feature sets with a simple linear support vector machine classifier in an online fashion and obtain superior segmentation results with our feature signals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896320306820; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.396; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119957723&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405896320306820; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.396
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know