Soy protein-polysaccharide complex coacervate under physical treatment: Effects of pH, ionic strength and polysaccharide type
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, ISSN: 1466-8564, Vol: 68, Page: 102612
2021
- 51Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The objective of this paper is to explore the effects of pH, ionic strength and polysaccharide type on the aqueous phase behaviors and rheological properties of soy protein isolate-chitosan (SPI-CS) and soy protein isolate-carboxymethyl cellulose (SPI-CMC) coacervates treated by vortex fluidic device (VFD) and shear homogenization. Characterization in terms of phase behavior and microstructures depicted that the VFD and shear homogenization treatments affected only the SPI-CS complex. According to the ζ- potential values at tested pHs (3.0–8.0), both physical processing had insignificant effect on charge stabilization of protein-polysaccharide complex. Both the SPI-CS coacervates (at pH 7.0) and SPI-CMC coacervates (at pH 3.0) showed gel-type rheological behaviors (G′ > 1000 Pa), suggesting that the SPI and polysaccharides did not form complex coacervate (liquid in nature) but interpolymeric complex (solid in nature). In the absence of salt ions, independent on the type of coacervate, VFD slightly decreased the modulus (G′ < 1000 Pa) while homogenization significantly decreased the modulus (G′ < 20 Pa). Alternatively, the addition of salt ions produced an electrostatic shielding and weakened the protein-polysaccharide electrostatic interaction, resulting in a decrease of coacervate modulus. Interestingly, under certain condition, VFD treatment probably promoted the interaction between protein molecules in protein-polysaccharide coacervate, resulting in another increase in the elastic modulus of the complex coacervate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856421000138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102612; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099353369&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856421000138; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102612
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know