The effects of using intermittent metal part reinforcement and countersink on the strength of adhesively bonded joints
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, ISSN: 0143-7496, Vol: 130, Page: 103613
2024
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study investigates the impact of two innovative methods, namely, intermittent metal part reinforcement and countersinking, on the strength of single lap joints (SLJs). In the former method, metal inserts are strategically integrated within the adhesive layer, while the latter involves the application of countersinks on the adherends to create conical depressions for adhesive application. The metal inserts and countersink samples were fabricated using a 5-axis CNC milling machine. Subsequently, the joints were produced by subjecting the samples to 0.15 MPa pressure and 70 °C temperature for 120 min with the aid of a hot press. Tensile tests were conducted on single lap joints (SLJs) featuring five different configurations of intermittent metal part reinforcement joints (IMRJs) with varying sizes and positions of reinforcements, as well as six countersunk reinforced joints (CRJs) with different orientations of countersinks, all while keeping the width and overlap length constant. A two-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the IMRJ was constructed using ABAQUS software, incorporating cohesive zone elements to simulate the behavior of the adhesive layer (DP 460). The model's accuracy was confirmed through experimental verification. Additionally, fractographic analysis of the failure surfaces of both types of joints was carried out. The inclusion of IMRJs and CRJs in the SLJs increased their load-carrying capacity by more than 10 % and 30 %, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749623002932; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103613; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85181761513&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0143749623002932; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103613
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know