Genetic diversity of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Tunisia
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, ISSN: 0924-8579, Vol: 53, Issue: 1, Page: 63-69
2019
- 8Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef3
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
This study aimed to explore the genetic diversity of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in a Tunisian pneumology hospital. A total of 141 S. pneumoniae strains isolated between 2009–2016 in the microbiology laboratory at A. Mami Hospital of Pneumology were investigated. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed the disk diffusion method. MICs of penicillin G, amoxicillin and cefotaxime were determined by Etest. Serotyping was inferred from the results of multiplex PCR targeting 40 serotypes. Sequence types (STs) were determined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Among the 141 S. pneumoniae isolates, 98 (69.5%) were resistant to erythromycin. Evaluation of β-lactam susceptibility showed that 90 strains (63.8%) were non-susceptible to penicillin, whereas 48 (34.0%) had decreased susceptibility to amoxicillin and 21 (14.9%) to cefotaxime. Twenty-five serotypes were detected, and 10 isolates were classified as non-typeable. Vaccine coverage was 56.7%, 60.3% and 75.2% for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 7 (PCV7), PCV10 and PCV13, respectively. Overall, 73 STs were identified, including 23 described for the first time. The most frequent STs were ST179 ( n = 17), ST3772 ( n = 14), ST2918 ( n = 10) and ST4003 ( n = 5), related to serotypes 19F, 19A, 14 and 23F, respectively. Moreover, 110 strains were classified within 45 STs. Three international antimicrobial-resistant clones were found, including Denmark 14 -ST230 ( n = 22), Spain 9V -ST156 ( n = 22) and Portugal 19F -ST177 ( n = 20). This study emphasises the clonal and international dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant S. pneumoniae clones. Significant differences in genetic variation were documented by MLST within the various serotypes identified.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857918302826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.023; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85058475212&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30296580; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924857918302826; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.023
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know