High-dose ivermectin for early treatment of COVID-19 (COVER study): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase II, dose-finding, proof-of-concept clinical trial
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, ISSN: 0924-8579, Vol: 59, Issue: 2, Page: 106516
2022
- 42Citations
- 102Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations42
- Citation Indexes38
- 38
- CrossRef9
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Captures102
- Readers102
- 102
- Mentions3
- News Mentions2
- News2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
2:00PM Water Cooler 1/24/2022
~ Today's Water Cooler ~
Most Recent News
Health: Was Ivermectin Unfairly Torpedoed as Treatment for COVID-19?
Medication has become the poster child for conflicted scientific, regulatory issues that surround COVID-19 Controversy seems to surround virtually everything connected with COVID-19: masking, social
Article Description
High concentrations of ivermectin demonstrated antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of high-dose ivermectin in reducing viral load in individuals with early SARS-CoV-2 infection. This was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase II, dose-finding, proof-of-concept clinical trial. Participants were adults recently diagnosed with asymptomatic/oligosymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exclusion criteria were: pregnant or lactating women; CNS disease; dialysis; severe medical condition with prognosis <6 months; warfarin treatment; and antiviral/chloroquine phosphate/hydroxychloroquine treatment. Participants were assigned (ratio 1:1:1) according to a randomised permuted block procedure to one of the following arms: placebo (arm A); single-dose ivermectin 600 μg/kg plus placebo for 5 days (arm B); and single-dose ivermectin 1200 μg/kg for 5 days (arm C). Primary outcomes were serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) and change in viral load at Day 7. From 31 July 2020 to 26 May 2021, 32 participants were randomised to arm A, 29 to arm B and 32 to arm C. Recruitment was stopped on 10 June because of a dramatic drop in cases. The safety analysis included 89 participants and the change in viral load was calculated in 87 participants. No SADRs were registered. Mean (S.D.) log 10 viral load reduction was 2.9 (1.6) in arm C, 2.5 (2.2) in arm B and 2.0 (2.1) in arm A, with no significant differences ( P = 0.099 and 0.122 for C vs. A and B vs. A, respectively). High-dose ivermectin was safe but did not show efficacy to reduce viral load.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857921013571; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106516; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123820911&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34999239; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924857921013571; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106516; https://www-sciencedirect-com.translate.goog/science/article/pii/S0924857921013571?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=ja&_x_tr_hl=ja; https://www-sciencedirect-com.translate.goog/science/article/pii/S0924857921013571?via%3Dihub&_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=ja&_x_tr_hl=ja&_x_tr_pto=wapp; https://www-sciencedirect-com.translate.goog/science/article/pii/S0924857921013571?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=ja&_x_tr_hl=ja&_x_tr_pto=wapp
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know