Exploring xylan removal via enzymatic post-treatment to tailor the properties of cellulose nanofibrils for packaging film applications
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, ISSN: 0141-8130, Vol: 274, Issue: Pt 2, Page: 133325
2024
- 1Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Hemicellulose plays a key role in both the production of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and their properties as suspensions and films. While the use of enzymatic and chemical pre-treatments for tailoring hemicellulose levels is well-established, post-treatment methods using enzymes remain relatively underexplored and hold significant promise for modifying CNF film properties. This study aimed to investigate the effects of enzymatic xylan removal on the properties of CNF film for packaging applications. The enzymatic post-treatment was carried out using an enzymatic cocktail enriched with endoxylanase (EX). The EX post-treated-CNFs were characterized by LALLS, XRD, and FEG-SEM, while their films were characterized in terms of physical, morphological, optical, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties. Employing varying levels of EX facilitated the hydrolysis of 8 to 35 % of xylan, yielding CNFs with different xylan contents. Xylan was found to be vital for the stability of CNF suspensions, as its removal led to the agglomeration of nanofibrils. Nanostructures with preserved crystalline structures and different morphologies, including nanofibers, nanorods, and their hybrids were observed. The EX post-treatment contributed to a smoother film surface, improved thermostability, and better moisture barrier properties. However, as the xylan content decreased, the films became lighter (lower grammage), less strong, and more brittle. Thus, the enzymatic removal of xylan enabled the customization of CNF films' performance without affecting the inherent crystalline structure, resulting in materials with diverse functionalities that could be explored for use in packaging films.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813024041308; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133325; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197359890&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38908627; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0141813024041308; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133325
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know