Gender differences in the management of acute coronary syndrome patients: One year results from HPIAR (HP-India ACS Registry)
International Journal of Cardiology, ISSN: 0167-5273, Vol: 248, Page: 1-6
2017
- 23Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef15
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
Article Description
Data from high-income countries suggest that women receive less intensive diagnostic and therapeutic management than men for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There is a paucity of such data in the Indian population, which is 69% rural and prior studies focused mostly on urban populations. The objective of the present study was to identify the gender based differences in ACS management, if any, in a predominantly rural population. Data from 35 hospitals across Himachal Pradesh covering > 90% of state population were collected for one year (July 2015–June 2016). A total of 2118 ACS subjects met inclusion criteria and baseline characteristics, in-hospital treatments and mortality rates were analyzed. Women constituted less than one-third of ACS population. Women were older compared to men and were more likely to present with NSTEMI/UA. Misinterpretation of initial symptoms and late presentation were also common in women. Fewer women received optimal guideline based treatment and PCI (0.9% vs 4.2%, p < 0.01). Compare to men, women more often had Killip class > 1 (27.3% vs 20.4%, p < 0.01) and higher in-hospital mortality (8.5% vs 5.6%, p = 0.009). On multivariate analysis the association between female gender and mortality was attenuated (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.36 [0.77–2.38]). The present study from India, is the first of its kind to evaluate the gender based differences among ACS patients, in a predominantly rural population. Our analysis demonstrates a significant gender based difference between symptom awareness and delay in presentation, management and in-hospital outcome. Further studies are warranted across other parts of country to investigate this gender disparity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016752731730339X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.028; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029628098&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28942868; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016752731730339X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.028
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know