The shape of the left lateral ridge as a predictor of long-term outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation based on clinical and experimental data
International Journal of Cardiology, ISSN: 0167-5273, Vol: 329, Page: 91-98
2021
- 4Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
The left lateral ridge (LLR) is an important structure for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study assessed how the LLR shape is associated with the long-term outcomes of AF ablation and investigated the relationship with radiofrequency (RF) lesion formation. Clinical study - we assessed multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images in 247 patients who underwent AF ablation. Patients were classified into two groups according to the shape of the LLR: Narrow LLR group (n = 116; 47%) and Wide LLR group (n = 131; 53%). After a follow-up period 475 ± 245 days, the AF-free rate was significantly higher in the wide LLR than Narrow LLR group (83.2% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.0004). A multivariate analysis showed that the shape of the LLR was an independent predictor of AF recurrence after ablation (hazard ratio 2.58; 95% confidential interval = 1.48–4.51, p = 0.001). Experimental study - Two types of the ridge models were made with porcine atrial tissues: “Narrow ridge(4.2 ± 0.9 mm)” and “Wide ridge(9.7 ± 1.8 mm)” RF ablation was performed on each ridge model using a contact force (CF)-sensing catheter. The mean CF and the RF lesion volume of the narrow ridge were significantly less than those of the wide ridge model (5.42 ± 3.13 g vs. 10.37 ± 3.98 g, p = 0.001; 19.8 ± 9.9 mm 3 vs. 44.2 ± 13.6 mm 3, p < 0.001, respectively). AF recurrence after ablation was more frequent in patients with a narrow LLR. LLR shape as assessed using MDCT is associated with long-term outcomes after AF ablation. CF and lesion formation data using the porcine atrial tissue model support our clinical results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527320343035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.055; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099167130&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370558; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167527320343035; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.055
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know