Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with a working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
International Journal of Cardiology, ISSN: 0167-5273, Vol: 349, Page: 12-17
2022
- 16Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef4
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a distinct entity among patients presenting with troponin-positive acute chest pain. We have previously reported on the incremental diagnostic capability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in this cohort. There is paucity of evidence on the long-term (> 5 years) clinical outcomes of these patients as graded by their acute CMR diagnosis. A total of 229 patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA who underwent CMR assessment during the acute admission (2010–2017) were prospectively studied. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular readmissions, identified from hospital and primary care records. CMR performed at a median of 6 days (IQR 2, 8) from presentation provided a diagnosis in 85% of the patients (38% myocarditis, 28% acute myocardial infarction and 19% Takotsubo cardiomyopathy). Over a median follow-up of 7.1 years (IQR 3.7, 8.2), 56 (24%) patients experienced a MACE. We found a strong association between CMR diagnosis and MACE (log rank 30.47, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval = 1.05, 1.10; p < 0.001) and CMR diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (hazard ratio = 8.87; 95% confidence interval = 2.58, 30.4; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of MACE. In a large cohort of patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA, one in four suffer a MACE during long-term clinical follow-up. CMR diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and age were significant predictors of MACE even in the absence of significant coronary artery obstruction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527321019793; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.088; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121324491&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864074; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167527321019793; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.088
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know