Update on coronary artery spasm 2022 – A narrative review
International Journal of Cardiology, ISSN: 0167-5273, Vol: 359, Page: 1-6
2022
- 18Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef4
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Review Description
In today's era of precision medicine a renaissance of functional coronary disease including coronary artery spasm (CAS) can be observed. This development is fueled by novel diagnostic methods as well as first evidence from randomized trials regarding targeted treatment approaches. The present review provides a contemporary update on advances in the pathophysiological understanding, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of CAS. A MEDLINE/PubMed search within the period from 2010 to 2021 was performed focusing on original articles, randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews on CAS. Among 1.639 citations, articles that were considered to contain the most important and novel data on CAS were included in this narrative review. These articles comprise reports on new insights into the complex pathophysiology of CAS, state-of-the-art invasive diagnostic procedures, reports on diagnosis of microvascular spasm and diagnosis of CAS in special conditions such as MINOCA, post-PCI angina or myocarditis. Moreover, novel treatment approaches are included such as nebivolol, endothelin-1-receptor antagonists and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. Furthermore, recent follow-up studies have provided new data on long-term prognosis of affected patients. Scientific progress during the last decade has led to a better understanding of CAS. Today, standardized international diagnostic criteria are available and promising randomized treatment trials are on their way. Moreover, there has been increasing evidence regarding the prognostic value of CAS testing. However, despite many advances, CAS remains a complex and not fully understood condition and more research is needed to better characterize and treat affected patients.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527322004910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129795954&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429510; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167527322004910; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.011
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know