Trends in adult congenital heart disease hospitalization in Texas over the past decade
International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease, ISSN: 2666-6685, Vol: 3, Page: 100098
2021
- 3Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
There are more than 1.4 million adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients estimated in the United States. As this population continues to grow, as will their utilization of the healthcare system. This study aims to analyze trends in discharges of ACHD patients in the state of Texas from 2009 through 2018. This is a retrospective review of the Texas Inpatient Discharge Public Use File from 2009 through 2018. Discharges from acute care hospitals of patients ≥18 years of age with an International Classification of Diseases 9 or 10 diagnosis code consistent with a CHD diagnosis which could be categorized by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology lesion severity score (LSS). Isolated atrial septal defect and congenital aortic valve insufficiency diagnoses were excluded from the analysis. A total of 10,515 ACHD discharges were identified. Annual discharges increased from 930 to 1,315, a 41% increase during the study period (p-trend<0.001). This increase was driven by a 70% increase in LSS 2 and a 125% increase in LSS 3 discharges. (p-trend <0.001 for both). Discharges of patients ≥50 years of age increased 60% (p-trend = 0.008) as did concomitant diagnoses of traditional cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and hyperlipidemia (p-trend<0.001 for all). Overall in-hospital mortality was 0.18% and was unchanged throughout. (p-trend = 0.932). ACHD discharges have shown a significant and steady growth in number and complexity over the past 10 years representing a need for continued development of robust ACHD specialized care resources.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668521000227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100098; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85175441099&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666668521000227; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2666668521000227?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2666668521000227?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100098
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know