Use of OR in earthquake operations management: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, ISSN: 2212-4209, Vol: 65, Page: 102539
2021
- 15Citations
- 117Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
To reduce human losses and minimize social and economic disruption caused by large-scale earthquakes, effective planning and operational decisions need to be made by responsible agencies and institutions across all pre- and post-disaster stages. Operations Research (OR), which encompasses a broad array of quantitative and analytical methods for systematic decision making, has garnered a considerable amount of attention in the disaster operations management literature over the past few decades. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss main lines of research involving the use of OR techniques applied specifically to earthquakes disasters. As part of our review, we identify existing research gaps and propose a roadmap to guide future work and enhance the real-world applicability of OR to earthquake operations management. We emphasize the need for (i) developing models that are specifically tailored to earthquake operation management, including the need to contend with cascading effects and secondary disasters caused by aftershocks; (ii) greater stakeholder involvement in problem identification and methodological approach to enhance realism and adoption of OR models by practitioners; (iii) more holistic planning frameworks that combine decision making across multiple disaster stages; (iv) integration of OR methods with real- and near real-time information systems, while confronting the problem of dealing with missing and incomplete data; (v) greater use of use of multi-methodology and interdisciplinary approaches, including behavioral OR and Soft OR techniques as well as seismology and earthquake engineering expertise; and (vi) improved data generation defined at appropriate scales and better probability estimation of earthquake scenarios.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420921005008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102539; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114255866&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212420921005008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102539
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know