Resilience to future floods through flood memory approach: An example from West Bengal, India
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, ISSN: 2212-4209, Vol: 112, Page: 104788
2024
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
Managing flood situations is a combination of structural, non-structural, and socio-ecological approaches, where the latest includes an operative involvement from the local community, based on their experiences in past flood episodes. The instances of considering this indigenous knowledge and perception while planning for the flood mitigational framework in India are neither very popular a practice nor they are frequently exemplified - but while looking at the case studies from all over the world, this could be a powerful tool for gauging flood scenarios and the living with it. This paper aims to inspect the ways and approaches through which a local community memorizes the fury of floods, how this information can be put in a quantitative way, and can be realistically functioning for coping with future flood consequences. Focusing on the flood memory approach for community resilience, we present the findings of archival research, site-specific folklores and mythological stories (cultural), social methods, verbal methods, exploration of flood markers (structural), and campaigns and exhibitions (educational). A digital questionnaire-based survey was conducted in the most flood-suffering wards of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation area in West Bengal, and upon receiving the reactions, a Flood History Volatility Scale (FHVS) has been devised to test how the strength of an individual's flood memory varies due to some controlling factors. Based on the results obtained from memory work and perceiving the importance of community knowledge during the survey, a comprehensive flood risk management approach has been proposed for flood risk reduction and developing community resilience.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know