Analysis of Brazilian Emergency Operations Centers in disasters response management
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, ISSN: 2212-4209, Vol: 116, Page: 105040
2025
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) are structures that aim to integrate different public and private organizations with the aim of coordinating the provision of service operations for cities, such as: traffic control, and operation of traffic lights, incidents with falling trees, rain monitoring, public security, crowd control and assistance to victims of landslides, land and floods. Thus, it can be a challenge for public managers to define an appropriate EOC configuration for their municipalities, especially in those with high frequency of disasters. This paper outlines a typology of EOCs, based on data from Brazilian cities located in the states of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, and Santa Catarina. Three types of EOCs were identified: Civil Defense Operations Centers (CDOC), Monitoring Operations Centers (MOC), and Public Operations and Civil Defense Centers (POCDC). Each type has specific objectives and operational strategies and play a crucial role in coordinating public and private agencies during disaster situations. This article aims to provide reference models for municipalities facing flood, flash flood, and landslide emergencies—the primary causes of devastation and high mortality rates in the southern region of Brazil, which can be valuable for other emerging countries, such as India, Indonesia, Mexico, Bangladesh, etc. The proposed typology facilitates comparative analysis, adaptation, and implementation of effective strategies. It also allows for the integration of showcased best practices into other systems, aiding in policy development. Additionally, these models foster international knowledge exchange and collaboration in the field of disaster management.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924008021; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105040; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212060406&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212420924008021; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105040
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know