A mechanical perspective on vertebral segmentation
International Journal of Engineering Science, ISSN: 0020-7225, Vol: 83, Page: 124-137
2014
- 16Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Segmentation is a characteristic feature of the vertebrate body plan. The prevailing paradigm explaining its origin is the ‘clock and wave-front’ model, which assumes that the interaction of a molecular oscillator (clock) with a traveling gradient of morphogens (wave) pre-defines spatial periodicity. While many genes potentially responsible for these processes have been identified, the precise role of molecular oscillations and the mechanism leading to physical separation of the somites remain elusive. In this paper we argue that the periodicity along the embryonic body axis anticipating somitogenesis is controlled by mechanical rather than bio-chemical signaling. Using a prototypical model we show that regular patterning can result from a mechanical instability induced by differential strains developing between the segmenting mesoderm and the surrounding tissues. The main ingredients of the model are the assumptions that cell–cell adhesions soften when overstretched, and that there is an internal length scale defining the cohesive properties of the mesoderm. The proposed mechanism generates a robust number of segments without dependence on genetic oscillations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020722514001062; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.05.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84906704392&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020722514001062; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.05.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know