Convolutional neural network applied to detect electricity theft: A comparative study on unbalanced data handling techniques
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, ISSN: 0142-0615, Vol: 131, Page: 107085
2021
- 46Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Electricity theft is a problem that affects the efficiency and profitability of power companies. There are several studies and applications in order to detect electricity theft, including the use of artificial intelligence techniques and the most recent deep learning methods. For problems like it, the datasets utilized are completely unbalanced – consequently, the use of metrics as accuracy is not enough to properly evaluate the performance of the method for the application. In the present paper a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is applied to electricity theft detection problem using several techniques for balancing the classes of the dataset: Cost-Sensitive Learning, Random Oversampling, Random Undersampling, K-medoids based Undersampling, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique, and Cluster-based Oversampling. The objective is to compare and select the best unbalanced data-handling technique for CNN, utilizing a specific metric for problems with extremely unbalanced classes – the AUC (Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve). The results present that some techniques combined to CNN reach values of high quality, comparable to the obtained by other classifiers. Finally, the paper points studies related to electricity theft detection must deal with the unbalanced characteristic of the dataset in order to achieve better (or, in other words, correct) results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061521003240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107085; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105013658&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142061521003240; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107085
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know