Time-lapse gravity surveying as a monitoring tool for CO 2 storage
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, ISSN: 1750-5836, Vol: 60, Page: 93-99
2017
- 23Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Time-lapse gravity surveys are a potential low cost method for detecting CO 2 migration from a storage site, particularly where accumulation within an overlying aquifer is predicted. The modelled storage system consists of a storage reservoir (1000 m crestal depth) and an overlying aquifer at variable depths (50–750 m crest), within a simple dome structure. In leakage scenarios, these are connected by a single vertical permeable pathway. CO 2 leakage was simulated using the Permedia ® CO 2 simulator, and a gravity model calculated to compare a leakage and a non-leakage scenario. Time-lapse gravity surveys are likely to be able to detect CO 2 leakage with CO 2 accumulation within an aquifer to depths of at least 750 m, at least within an actively subsiding sedimentary basin where sandstones are expected to have high porosities at shallow burial depths. For a high relief structure in which the CO 2 accumulates, the change in gravity cannot be used to detect the location of the leakage pathway as the measured gravity anomaly is centred on the geological structure. The first detection of leakage is possible after 11–15 years of leakage, though a maximum of only c. 1% of injected CO 2 will have leaked at this time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583616303310; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85016056262&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583616303310; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know