Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of a single-item measure of online store usability
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, ISSN: 1071-5819, Vol: 69, Issue: 4, Page: 269-280
2011
- 78Citations
- 159Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In an experimental study, we examined the validity and reliability of a single-item measure for customers' assessment of online store usability. Each of the 378 participants visited two out of 35 online stores and performed three shopping related tasks. Usability was rated using a single-item and an eight-item measure. In addition to trust in the online store and aesthetics, we also measured the participant's intention to buy. Results from factor analysis and the correction for attenuation formula revealed an adequate reliability of the single-item measure. Positive correlations with both trust and aesthetics supported the convergent validity of the single-item measure for usability. The positive correlation between the single-item and the intention to buy demonstrated the high predictive validity of this measure. Finally, results support the sensitivity of the single-item measure to differentiate between the usability for each online store.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581910001278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79951680095&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1071581910001278; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1071581910001278?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1071581910001278?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know