Assessment of different RANS turbulence models in mini-channels for the cooling of MW-class gyrotron resonators
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, ISSN: 0017-9310, Vol: 193, Page: 122922
2022
- 10Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The adoption of high-speed water flow in mini-channels is a viable option for the cooling system of the resonant cavity in gyrotrons, which are a candidate technology for the external plasma heating in nuclear fusion reactors. The evaluation of the performance of such mini-channel cooling system is a combined fluid dynamics and heat transfer phenomenon which seeks more attention to a highly accurate computational analysis. In this study, a computational-based comparative platform is proposed to evaluate the performance and fidelity of the applied turbulence models which are utilized to study the mini-channel cavity cooling systems in gyrotrons. A full-size mock-up of the gyrotron resonator equipped with mini-channels has been realized and tested in 2019 by THALES to check its total pressure drop applying a wide range of water flow rates, including that available for the gyrotron operation. In parallel, a numerical model of the mock-up has been developed using the commercial software STAR-CCM+, and simulations have been performed using different RANS turbulence closures, and namely: SST k −ω, realizable k − ε and Lag EB k − ε. The detailed comparison of the computed hydraulic characteristics (i.e., a range of pressure drop measurements at different flow rates) to the set of measured values has been addressed using a multivariate metric to assess the performance of different turbulence models in pure hydraulic simulations. This comparative platform reveals a significant clarified difference in fidelity among the RANS models. Based on the performed comparative studies against the entire set of available experimental data, the Lag EB k − ε closure provides the best performance among the other turbulence models and can be applied for the future studies of the mini-channel cavity cooling systems of the gyrotron resonators.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0017931022003957; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122922; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129114382&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0017931022003957; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122922
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know