3D non-isothermal dynamic simulation of high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell in the start-up process
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, ISSN: 0360-3199, Vol: 46, Issue: 2, Page: 2577-2593
2021
- 32Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) with phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) electrolyte shows multiple advantages over conventional PEMFC working at below 373 K, such as faster electrochemical kinetics, simpler water management, higher carbon monoxide tolerance. However, starting HT-PEMFC from room temperature to the optimal operating temperature range (433.15 K–453.15 K) is still a serious challenge. In present work, the start-up strategy is proposed and evaluated and a three-dimensional non-isothermal dynamic model is developed to investigate start-up time and temperature distribution during the start-up process. The HT-PEMFC is preheated by gas to 393.15 K, followed by discharging a current from the cell for electrochemical heat generation. Firstly, different current loads are applied when the average temperature of membrane reaches 393.15 K. Then, the start-up time and temperature distribution of co-flow and counter-flow are compared at different current loads. Finally, the effect of inlet velocity and temperature on the start-up process are explored in the case of counter-flow. Numerical results clearly show that applied current load is necessary to reduce start-up time and just 0.1 A/cm 2 current load can reduce startup time by 45%. It is also found that co-flow takes 18.8% less time than counter-flow to heat membrane temperature to 393.15 K, but the maximum temperature difference of membrane is 39% higher than the counter-flow. Increasing the inlet gas flow velocity and temperature can shorten the start-up time but increases the temperature difference of the membrane.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319920339331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.116; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85095811184&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360319920339331; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0360319920339331?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0360319920339331?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.116
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know