Calculating active power for water electrolyzers in dynamic operation: Simple, isn’t it?
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, ISSN: 0360-3199, Vol: 91, Page: 267-271
2024
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Calculating the power consumption of water electrolyzers is a seemingly simple task. Yet, when the supplied current varies periodically in time, careless usage of simple equations can lead to tremendously erroneous results. These fluctuations in the supplied current are more or less reality in all industrial power electronic rectifiers. In this short communication, we will show mathematically how forgetting to include the power components inflicted by the fluctuating current or using simple equations defined for zero-centered, sinusoidal alternating currents causes incorrect results in the case of water electrolyzers with a fluctuating current supply. Our goal is to remind the scientific community of the importance of using accurate mathematical definitions of active power, along with appropriate measurement setups, to avoid significant errors in determining one of the key performance indicators of water electrolyzers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319924042551; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.064; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206079878&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360319924042551; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.064
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know