A possible way to experimentally examine validity of the expressions of dissipated energy density
Optik, ISSN: 0030-4026, Vol: 242, Page: 165756
2021
- 3Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
Article Description
There exist different and even unequivalent expressions of stored and dissipated energy densities, which relate to different conditions of division between stored and dissipated energies (CDSDEs), respectively. Here, we shall demonstrate that, for an electromagnetic wave normally traveling through a slab, energy absorbed by the slab (EAS) can be calculated by applying field quantities of forward and backward waves arising in the slab and selecting one of CDSDEs. On the other hand, the EAS can also be uniquely determined from scattering coefficients, which may be measured experimentally. Thus we shall suggest that applicability of CDSDEs may be tested by comparing EAS obtained from the two ways, subsequently, validity of the corresponding expression of dissipated energy density is examined. Furthermore, we shall confirm feasibility of the suggestion numerically and experimentally. This work may be helpful to properly describe energy storage and dissipation of electromagnetic wave in lossy media and address the related topics.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402620315825; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165756; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107289942&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0030402620315825; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165756
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know